Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plagiotremus rhinorhynchos (30873062447) (cropped).jpg

File:Plagiotremus rhinorhynchos (30873062447) (cropped).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2020 at 13:14:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Plagiotremus rhinorhynchos (30873062447) (cropped).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plagiotremus rhinorhynchos (30873062447) (cropped).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Blenniidae_(Combtooth_Blennies)
•  Info created by q phia - uploaded - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support pity about the foreground, but the main subject is very sharp at high resolution (and that with f/32!) --Ivar (talk) 14:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Ivar. Cmao20 (talk) 16:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral Too poor description, no information, where the photo was taken (aquarium?), no geocoding and DEAD LINK to the source. --Llez (talk) 16:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Not taken in aquarium, this image, though indeed not anymore availble, was coming from one of their wonderful diving albums, this one, I improved a bit the description. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose The unsharp coral takes up way too much of the image --StellarHalo (talk) 20:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per StellarHalo poor composition, though the fish is sharp. --Tagooty (talk) 07:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per StellarHalo. Daniel Case (talk) 05:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The detail of the fish is great, you cannot compare underwater photography with e.g. archicture photography in terms of composition Poco a poco (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 22:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support - sure, I wish that either the coral were in focus or more of it were out of focus, but the sharpness of the peekabooing fish is good enough for FP IMO — Rhododendrites ^talk |  18:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)