Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pfarrkiche Sankt Vigil in Kolfuschg mit Sellagruppe 2.jpg

File:Pfarrkirche Sankt Vigil in Kolfuschg mit Sellagruppe 2.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2014 at 22:26:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pfarrkirche Sankt Vigil in Kolfuschg mit Sellagruppe 2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pfarrkirche Sankt Vigil in Kolfuschg mit Sellagruppe 2.jpg

•  Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder as variant of of this FP as requested by some reviewers (talk) 22:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very good image! I like this kind of combination: lovely landscape + old church. Halavar (talk) 01:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral too centered imo. Also: I'm not sure whether this image needs another nomination, now that your tighter crop already got promoted to FP. I like the colors and the atmosphere, though --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Info This is a new image the other featured is not a crop, it was taken as is as you can read above--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:23, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

• weak  Support OK, convinced. I'd still prefer a less centered composition, though. But anyway, as I said, colors and mood are really appealing to me. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support The suggested crop would be better but I support anyway. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 08:09, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support as announced before. --DXR (talk) 09:19, 13 February 2014 (UTC) Sorry I wasn't aware that the other image had become featured. Given that is the case, I must unfortunately agree with A.Savin and take back my support. --DXR (talk) 10:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

  You suggested to nominate this image, now you support neither one ;-) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

  Well sorry ;-). I suggested that because I thought the other one wouldn't succeed (when I commented on the other image, it was 2 Support vs 2 Oppose...). I thought that this one would have better chances and I'd rather have seen this one being promoted than the other one (the first image gained support at a pretty late stage and I didn't notice that and assumed it had not been featured). Therefore I considered them more to be "alternatives" (in the infamous broad meaning). However I think they are too similar to both be promoted, and therefore I don't support this one. --DXR (talk) 13:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

  OK, thanks anyhow. I'm sure I'll get some support from you in the future. Gut Licht --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose Very similar image already FP and that's enough. --A.Savin 10:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Alex. Jebulon you need to be bold there. :) Jee 06:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

This is kinda domino....--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Hmm; I like this picture more; but we don't need two FPs, unfortunately. BTW, does here a slight CW tilt? Jee 08:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

If I have known that this pic should be nominated, I would have oppose to the previous candidate, which was promoted due to my...weakness... Anyway, after corrections (slight tilt, better crop at right etc...) this one has a better composition so the good way to do could be, IMO, a "delist and replace" process... If not, I'd vote as per A.Savin.--Jebulon (talk) 09:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

I sincerely think the other is more...spectacular lets keep it FP thanks also to the weakness of Jebulon 5 minutes before midnight ;-)--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:18, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment This is the mess you get into when forced to nominate separately but in fact the intention is only one would be FP. So in my view this should have been an alt of the original nomination. -- Colin (talk) 12:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think both candidates are pretty similar, and I do actually prefer the other one. Poco² 21:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 07:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose until there is no delist and replace. --Ivar (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely image. User:Llorenzi
•  Support --P e z i (talk) 20:32, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ivar. I prefer this one but don't support having two Featured Images that are so similar. Which is the "finest"? -- Colin (talk) 13:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:42, 21 February 2014 (UTC)