Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (2).jpg

File:Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 12:12:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (2).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (2).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info Little Venice from the rue de Turenne bridge in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). Gzen92 ^[discuter] 12:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Gzen92 ^[discuter] 12:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose bad light: the houses are in the shadow and the sky is too bright. —kallerna (talk) 15:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I understand, I adjusted light tones and dark tones. Is it better ? Thanks. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 07:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Pretty and good quality but the light is still dull. I assume you were shooting in the direction of the sun, which never quite works. Cmao20 (talk) 11:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kallerna and Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 17:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Difficult to manage the light... The original photo (with no adjustments) is better? Gzen92 ^[discuter] 08:35, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)