Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paseo Ciclista.jpg

File:Paseo Ciclista.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2016 at 14:42:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Paseo Ciclista.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paseo Ciclista.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info created by Abel Maestro Garcia - uploaded by Tyseria - nominated by Tyseria -- Tyseria (talk) 16:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tyseria (talk) 16:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
• regretful  Oppose – it’s really a brilliant idea and beautiful lighting, lots of wow. But then you somehow overdid it. Severe colour fringing on all structure edges, haloes from tonemapping, many blown/oversaturated patches, sharpening artifacts. Can it be redone? It’s a pity for the fine idea. --Kreuzschnabel 18:13, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Per Kreuz, but also, pictures with watermarks are per se disqualified from FP consideration. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel, and I'm not sure about the Flickr transfer with no review. This image is tagged with a CC-0 license here but is PD-Mark on Flickr. @Yann: @Jameslwoodward: Is PD-Mark from Flickr still a no-go? I haven't dealt with PD-Mark images in depth since I've never really seen many uploaded, but this image lacks a license review. INeverCry 20:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above. I hope you can solve the issues mentioned --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:59, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above, especially the PD Mark issue. --★ Poké⁹⁵ 06:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose As noted above, the license is not valid. I have removed the {{Cc-0}} tag, because it is not CC-0. A CC-0 license is irrevocable. The Public Domain Mark is simply an expression of opinion that the work is PD, but it can be changed at any time. Licenses for Commons must be irrevocable. Technically this is a {{Speedy}}, but I have put a {{Delete}} on it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: license issues, watermark, none possibility to succed here Ezarateesteban 11:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ezarateesteban 17:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)