Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paris-7957a.jpg

File:Paris-7957a.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2017 at 21:13:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Paris-7957a.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paris-7957a.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info created by idobi - uploaded by idobi - nominated by Idobi -- Idobi (talk) 21:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Idobi (talk) 21:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Stunning. I love the way the moon appears. Quality could be better especially on the right side but sufficient for FP. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 01:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose great composition, vivid colors, excellent mood - if only image quality were better --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I really like composition, perfect moon-clouds situation. Its not so sharp, but saw camera is not the latest model.--Mile (talk) 07:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose - It either is or is not an FP, based on the results, regardless of what equipment is used. And in this case, I think it's too noisy and unsharp to be one of the greatest night cityscape pictures, although the composition is beautiful. I would welcome any efforts by idobi to address these issues, because I'd love to be able to support this picture, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral I find it a beautiful picture, but the quality is not great.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose per Famberhorst. Even given that it was a long exposure, we've seen that these images can be less noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Martin Poco² 08:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per opposers. And the file name is not accurate.--Jebulon (talk) 09:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:17, 25 January 2017 (UTC)