Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pantani di Accumoli.jpg

File:Pantani di Accumoli.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2016 at 19:02:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pantani di Accumoli.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pantani di Accumoli.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created by Leonardo Angelini - uploaded by Alexmar983 - nominated by Alexmar983 -- Alexmar983 (talk) 20:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support As the uploader/nominator. I found it whilst looking for image to describe the area hit by the recent earthquake in Central Italy. The Italian photographer was very nice and removed the original copyright mark at the bottom (but the flickr license was ok since the beginning). I think it is very nice picture, I love the contrast of colors and he clouds around the top of the mountains.-- Alexmar983 (talk) 20:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

I probably forgot to transclude this page somewhere, I've asked for help. Sorry.--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose - I salute your motivations, but this photo is way too unsharp for FP or QI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

my motivation was that I liked the picture, and to me is of good quality. Why are you "saluting" them?--Alexmar983 (talk) 11:29, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, per Ikan Kekek. --Basotxerri (talk) 20:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, per Ikan Kekek and too noisy--Lmbuga (talk) 02:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose unsharp, noisy and CAs. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose In addition to the technical issues noted above, I don't find it a very good picture. I can see, as I often do, why someone decided to give it a try. But it needed more skill than the photographer demonstrates here to make the subtle beauty that might have been there come out. Daniel Case (talk) 15:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Noted that this is added to FPC list later. But the bot will close it again due to older time-stamp. 5 opposes already; so close to FPX. Jee 04:39, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Jee 04:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)