Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panoramic view of Caracas, Venezuela 1900 restored version.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2020 at 14:21:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Caracas, Venezuela 1900 restored version
I will do that this weekend. Thanks for your feedback --Wilfredor (talk) 12:14, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wait a second. KoH, you want a historical photo altered by adding fake sky to it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The original clearly had tears at the top, so some fake sky has already been added. Since this is a print, I wouldn't be surprised if the original negative had a bit more on all sides. We don't want to change the original artistic intent of the photographer, but there likely was more at the top when they took the photo. I don't need a lot, just a tiny hair more at the top. -- King of ♥ 21:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any way we can see the negative? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment There have been. Just as a reproduction of a painting can be a QI if the reproduction is done by a Commoner, so can a scan (restored or not) of a historic photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I understand that a photo or scan of a painting or old photo made by a Commoner can be a QI, but here the scan was made by the Library of Congress's Prints and Photographs division and not Wilfredor, if I'm reading the source right. --Cart (talk) 19:16, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think we should allow QIs as long as a Commoner has done significant work. The goal is to reward effort by community members, and Wilfredor has clearly spent way more time on this image than most people spend on their self-photographed QIs. -- King of ♥ 04:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:19, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]