Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palestine 4 GHR 15.jpg

File:Palestine 4 GHR 15.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2016 at 14:06:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Palestine 4 GHR 15.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palestine 4 GHR 15.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info 50px|link=User:ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2/Nomination of featured images on Arabic Wikipedia Project Featured picture on Arabic Wikipedia.created by Trocaire - uploaded by Flickr upload bot - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice portrait but there are dust spots in the sky and a halo at his left cheek. cart-Talk 14:26, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
  • I see that the face is natural and there is no problem in the sky --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
    • I have marked some of the dust spots (there may be more) and the almost white halo next to his cheek, please see notes on the file. cart-Talk 15:24, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment The lighting is just ideal for this portrait (professional use of a flash/compulsory flash) and the man and the scenery are worth the image. However, the white halo aside his left cheek is very disturbing to me (maybe a matter of cranking up the dynamic range too much, see below). In addition I wonder why at a focal lenght of 24mm the sharpness of the background is so mediocre. Lastly, I find the overall increased contrast or elevated dynamic range disturbing, --AWeith (talk) 17:42, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose for now, because of the dust spots and halo. If those problems are taken care of, I would expect to support this as otherwise a very good portrait. Even though like AWeith, I would prefer a clearer background, I recognize that it's legitimate to focus on the subject, and perhaps there's even a poetic point being made in blurring the background somewhat. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not just because of the technical issues. I don't find the composition works for me. It could at least be cropped in on the sides to square it up around the face because we don't see enough of the vehicle to justify that orientation. Daniel Case (talk) 22:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. lNeverCry 22:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 21:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC)