Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oxbow Bend outlook in the Grand Teton National Park.jpg

File:Oxbow Bend outlook in the Grand Teton National Park.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2009 at 18:40:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Oxbow Bend outlook in the Grand Teton National Park.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oxbow Bend outlook in the Grand Teton National Park.jpg

•  Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support White balance may be slightly off, but what a composition! --MattiPaavola (talk) 19:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - WOW --Pudelek (talk) 21:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR (talk) 22:18, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Nice picture, but it does not WOW me. The things that would and in the background and partly obscured. Kleuske (talk) 23:30, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 00:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:49, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral The background is stunning, sadly the foreground is too intrusive for me. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:54, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Odd colours, small problems with quality, composition doesn't work for me. —kallerna™ 14:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose colors look not natural, unsharp, quality is too bad --Simonizer (talk) 14:38, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree about the colors, they look a bit bleak. /Daniel78 (talk) 20:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support per MattiPaavola. --.dsm. 20:50, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Foreground is not that convincing, but IMO the background sufficiantly makes up for it. Nikopol (talk) 20:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support per MattiPaavola Je-str (talk) 09:38, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unnatural colors. Daniel Case (talk) 06:47, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice color but plants in foreground are too intrusives and image is blur (Focus is only on some branch on the righ of the pict). Olivier Jaulent (talk) 13:58, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 18:28, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Great picture, and the foreground adds to the picture IMO. Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 18:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Wolf (talk) 00:08, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support colors --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:11, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural