Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orthetrum luzonicum-Kadavoor-2016-09-08-001.jpg

File:Orthetrum luzonicum-Kadavoor-2016-09-08-001.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2016 at 09:47:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Orthetrum luzonicum-Kadavoor-2016-09-08-001.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orthetrum luzonicum-Kadavoor-2016-09-08-001.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata
•  Info created and uploaded by Jeevan Jose (Jkadavoor) - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - This is one of the clearest dragonfly pictures I've seen. We can see the compound eyes, and the body is also nicely clear. Good composition and fine bokeh, in my opinion. And for what it's worth, we have no featured pictures of this species of dragonfly, as of yet. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 09:51, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Unusual wing position too. cart-Talk 10:00, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Thanks Ikan Kekek for the nom. He is perching on Colocasia esculenta and the background is also another leaf. Jee 11:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - You're welcome. Thanks for the additional background information. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support excellent --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Underexposed! --Ivar (talk) 12:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

• The pruinescence is very difficult to manage; but I brightened a bit. Please check. Ivar, Ikan Kekek, W.carter, Martin Falbisoner... Jee 13:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - I have no objection to the edit. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
• Now that I know what it is, this looks even better. You da' man! :) cart-Talk 13:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

• Haha; I'm behind them for years. Now know about them better than themselves. ;) Jee 13:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Info @Jkadavoor: Please check last version, I added a bit contrast. --Ivar (talk) 13:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks Ivar! I need to lean all editing tricks. ;) Jee 13:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - OK, overall, I think this version is the best. But please, let's have no more edits while the photo is being considered for a feature, because more edits are likely to confuse people and result in opposition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Jee 13:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 14:25, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Nice, clean and striking composition as well as good image quality. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:39, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Agree it needed that boost to contrast after lightening. -- Colin (talk) 20:39, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Good detail and very simple composition. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 17:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:52, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 22:03, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata