Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Opgebaggerd hout (Langweerderwielen) 03.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Opgebaggerd hout (Langweerderwielen) 03.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2017 at 04:18:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural Netherlands
Info Dredged wood that has lain for years underwater.
The wood on this image has been under water for years. It has been removed from the lake during dredging operations. created All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Oppose A more selective crop (see note) might work better here and B&W is not doing this documentation photo any favors. With color, the waterlogged logs might have contrasted well with the green(?) grass and plants and giving the viewer a clue as to what this is. In B&W it looks to much like ordinary burnt firewood. --cart-Talk 09:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Done. Photo cut out. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Question: this picture is better?
--Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- It's better, but the plants were not as interesting as I hoped for. I think that for such an image to work, you need some extraordinary feature in the wood, dramatic light or something beside the log that is beautiful, creating a contrast. Sort of like this log. --cart-Talk 20:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Oppose per cart. Daniel Case (talk) 15:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Oppose why B&W??? Boring. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Weak
Support IMO a good idea to use black-and-white to improve the structures. --XRay talk 15:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results: