Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Old church door.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Old church door.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2009 at 20:24:17
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Graphic elements on display: Texture and contour -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral The rightmost part of the door does not bring a good contrast to the photo. Maybe you should crop that part out. (Tiago Fioreze (talk) 20:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC))
- Support could be a little sharper in some areas but a striking image --ianaré (talk) 23:42, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support What's behind the keyhole ? Where is it from ? Feed the hungry image description --Richard Bartz (talk) 00:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- It is at the Cuernavaca Cathedral in Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico... What´s behind??? Secrets! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Great detail, and it's a picture with atmosphere. What secrets lurk behind? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Excellent composition. Durova (talk) 20:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose In my view this is an almost "Featured picture". I just don't feel this is an example of our best work... with all due
regardrespect to the creativity shown here. Crapload (talk) 06:19, 30 January 2009 (UTC) - Comment Can you add a category? I don't think images should be promoted to FP without one. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose No, no wow. --Karel (talk) 22:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral Needs a crop on the right. Maciej (talk) 08:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Dori - Talk 03:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose no wow factor - Man On Mission (talk) 11:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow, needs a crop. —kallerna™ 13:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support good composition and colours --Muhammad 16:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Cropped. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Comment You might want to put the cropped version in a second listing. 118.208.46.132 00:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- ** Comment Well, on a good look I do like the cropped version better. But it doesn't matter anymore, nomination is about to close. But thanks for the comment. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- That was me, I forgot to log in. And yas, I also prefer the cropped version. It appears a re-nomination might be in order. Any disagreement? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 03:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- ** Comment Well, on a good look I do like the cropped version better. But it doesn't matter anymore, nomination is about to close. But thanks for the comment. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Comment You might want to put the cropped version in a second listing. 118.208.46.132 00:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. Pom² (talk) 21:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)