Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ocean beach at low tide against the sun.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2010 at 12:45:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ocean Beach at low tide
  •  Comment I was too lazy to write comments and I followed the comments of Grinatyou.. Here are my comments: The image is too dark for me, has unnatural colors (probably during the settings of the camera and the contra-light conditions), no details in the bird (only silhouette). The form of the image (actually only form we see here) does not convince me (I don't find the composition well-balanced). Images like that (that actually we see only form / shadows) are better in black & white. This image lacks of color and a black & white version will be more interesting.. with dark parts, white parts, middle gray tones etc. But since the contrast is too high I don't know if this image succeed in b&w (because it misses middle tones - this is usually a problems of digital sensors that have low dynamic range). As I mentioned above Mbz1 has much better images than this one. Ggia (talk) 08:34, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well everybody could come here and say: "I see technical problems, composition problems, lack of value" without saying what the problems are. And I am not looking forward for clarification of that review because according to the user, if he "explains them in detail it would be abusive". I do have much better images than this one, but it is not a reason to oppose this one I guess. It's OK, no worries --Mbz1 (talk) 16:53, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is not black and white picture! It is only photographed against the sun. O siyah beyaz bir resim değil! Sadece güneşe karşı fotoğraflandı olduğunu.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:49, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is added to 4 categories! Of course there's a value. Even, if it was an image of ocean waves only, there would have been a value. --Mbz1 (talk) 18:08, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And three more by me, but...--Jebulon (talk) 11:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is not black and white image. The colors came from settings and mostly because it was taken against the sun. The image was practically not post processed.--03:23, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- I don't have any complaints with necessary post-processing (it's a major part of digital photography). However, the picture contains little or no color (hence it is a monochrome or black-and-white photo). Perhaps you used the "Monochrome" Picture Style setting on your Rebel XTi? LeavXC (talk) 04:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, I used no special settings at all.--Mbz1 (talk) 04:23, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:00, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural