Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oats in a field.jpg

File:Oats in a field.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2016 at 21:33:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Oats in a field.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oats in a field.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order : Poales
•  Info All by me -- w.carter-Talk 21:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- w.carter-Talk 21:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I'm sorry, but I don't share your interest in this motif. Nothing special to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blueish colours, object partly blurred. Not bad, but not excellent either. Maybe a bit underexposed. --Kreuzschnabel 07:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

• To clarify, the oats really were this bluish which is why I thought it remarkable enough to take the pic in the first place (check the small white flowers for WB) and the day was incredibly clear, couldn't do anything about the wind though... ;) Tiny bit brighter now. --w.carter-Talk 08:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Beside its composition, for me it does not contribute a remarkable learning value. -- Zcebeci (talk) 17:53, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan. INeverCry 18:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others; looks oversaturated, like a polarizer was used, and nothing stands out with the composition. Daniel Case (talk) 06:11, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

• Nope, no filter or saturation, this is straight out of the can. I'd be happy to email the raw tilted photo to anyone who'd like to compare. I did not even own a polarization filter then, have bought one now though. No worries folks, I get the message: Oats may be good for your body but it's boring to look at. Onto the next!

•  I withdraw my nomination --w.carter-Talk 06:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)