Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nijubashi bridge Edo castle Tokyo Japan by D Ramey Logan.jpg

File:Nijubashi bridge Edo castle Tokyo Japan by D Ramey Logan.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2015 at 05:16:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Nijubashi bridge Edo castle Tokyo Japan by D Ramey Logan.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nijubashi bridge Edo castle Tokyo Japan by D Ramey Logan.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info created by WPPilot - uploaded by WPPilot - nominated by WPPilot -- WPPilot (talk) 05:16, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- WPPilot (talk) 05:16, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose The scenery in general is interesting and could probably made an FP. But there are imho too many issues with the photo. You should compose / crop your photo more thoroughly - there are some distracting elements in the images borders (see notes). E.g. certain branches hanging from the top are not fortunate. There are further quality issues: CAs, most remarkable at the top right. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:35, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose follwing the good review by Tuxyso. — Julian H.^✈ 11:10, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry,nice but not very good quality --LivioAndronico talk 16:54, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Tuxyso. And though it’s above size limit, I expect an FPC of just 6 mpix to be crisp sharp. --Kreuzschnabel 17:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Tuxyso. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:21, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Tuxiso. The image is improperly categorized. --Cayambe (talk) 19:58, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment What category would you suggest this be in?? --WPPilot (talk) 23:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

 Comment Category:Edo Castle, Castle with an uppercase C. :-) Regards, --Cayambe (talk) 07:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

 fixed and I also added "Category:Tokyo Imperial Palace". --Laitche (talk) 10:23, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose It is too dark. --Tremonist (talk) 12:55, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Alternative 1

•  Oppose It's better now that the issues are fixed, but at 4.5 MP, any bit of unsharpness is too much. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: this nomination suffers of too many negative votes, due to the several flaws noticed by reviewers.--Jebulon (talk) 21:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.