Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:New York Botanical Garden October 2016 004.jpg

File:New York Botanical Garden October 2016 004.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2018 at 09:05:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:New York Botanical Garden October 2016 004.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:New York Botanical Garden October 2016 004.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:05, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:05, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I regret that I find the weird perspective distortion unattractive and unpleasant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle (talk) 18:22, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose unless we can do something about that distortion at right. Daniel Case (talk) 18:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral Very pleasant image, and good. The thing that disturb me is the green hedge at left. It is a little too predominant, that breaks the good perspective. In general terms two possible solutions with a disturbing element that we can not avoid, 1/ a different lighting which also changes the colors and therefore the key points of the image, and/or 2/ a different composition that integrates precisely this element (make it even more predominant). Happy Holidays, regards, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Alt

•  Info @Ikan Kekek, Peulle, and Daniel Case: I've made a 5:4 crop of the right which I think might help it look more natural. Otherwise this is simply how this scene actually appears with a wide-angle lens, and since I've already made verticals straight there's not much else I can do. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Thanks, but I'm going to continue to oppose. If the perspective distortion is unavoidable and uncorrectable, this may not be a good subject for a wide-angle lens. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan, I'm afraid.--Peulle (talk) 22:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)