Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nelson Falls.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Nelson Falls.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2010 at 10:54:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Noodle snacks - uploaded by Noodle snacks - nominated by Noodle snacks -- Noodle snacks (talk) 10:54, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Support This is one waterfall that actually looks more interesting with a bit less water in my view. -- Noodle snacks (talk) 10:54, 13 January 2010 (UTC)- Seems a little tilted to the right? Diliff (talk) 20:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Fair point - I gave it a tilt. Noodle snacks (talk) 22:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Still seems fairly tilted. Perhaps it's an optical illusion due to the irregular path of the water on the falls. There aren't any known verticals, and it's a wide angle view, which complicates it. Diliff (talk) 14:08, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Fair point - I gave it a tilt. Noodle snacks (talk) 22:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Comment The sky is badly overburnt. :( Could you reshoot this waterfall some day (when the sky is blue)? —kallerna™ 22:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Photographing a waterfall like this in direct sunlight is a bad idea in my view. The brightness across the scene would vary dramatically and it wouldn't look very good. Unfortunately a blue sky tends to imply that the sun would be out. I don't think blending such extremes in brightness would look very good either. Noodle snacks (talk) 22:31, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Oppose I'm not too fussed about the sky, but to feature a detailed landscape like this, I'd want a higher resolution. Additionally, there's a fair bit of red CA on the dead tree trunk lying on the left that you might want to look into. IMO the foreground is really nice. --99of9 (talk) 04:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:11, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
