Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NASA's Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 905 (front) and 911 (rear).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Feb 2013 at 16:23:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

NASA's Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 905 (front) and 911 (rear)
  •  Info created by NASA/Carla Thomas - uploaded and nominated by Ras67 (talk) 16:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support An irretrievable image, both airplanes are retired due to the end of the Shuttle program. -- Ras67 (talk) 16:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Peter23 (talk) 06:21, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment There is some mist in the air, which makes the picture appear a bit dull. While this is perfectly normal for aerial photographs, it is not too hard to remove that. --El Grafo (talk) 13:12, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose -- Interesting but not exceptional. The colours are washed out and the backgroung is a bit distracting. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:26, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment There is a higher resolution file in the Dryden Image Gallery that has very low contrast, I used that to create a WB/contrast-corrected version:
  • Higher resolution, less haze
    Higher resolution, less haze
  • Less busy background
    Less busy background
    • The original from there would also be an alternative. --Julian H. (talk/files) 14:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Comment Imo, your version is much better mist-wise, but the blue stripes on the fuselages seem to be a bit dark now. Also, it seems to be a bit too brown/yellow-ish (have a look at the lower side of the fuselages: I guess they should be in a neutral grey? They have a slight color cast in the original too, but it has become stronger through the modifications). But maybe that's just my eyes/monitor tricking me. In terms of the background, I think I prefer the first option. I can't decide which one is the best one overall, so I'll simply  Abstain . --El Grafo (talk) 09:26, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        I tried to correct the issues you mentioned, to some extend. --Julian H. (talk/files) 09:45, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Confirmed results:
    Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]