Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow VDNKh Space Pavilion asv2018-08 img5.jpg

File:Moscow VDNKh Space Pavilion asv2018-08 img5.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Feb 2019 at 21:20:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow VDNKh Space Pavilion asv2018-08 img5.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow VDNKh Space Pavilion asv2018-08 img5.jpg

71

389

7846

4721

7952

5304

crop suggestion. --Cart (talk) 11:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Russia
•  Info Dome interior of the 32th Pavilion of VDNKh Park Moscow ("Space Exploration" Pavilion, built in 1954) All by A.Savin --A.Savin 21:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 21:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - I'm disappointed you weren't able to get the entire dome in the picture. I feel like even if it's partly blocked by other objects, it might be more satisfying for the entire area of the dome to be in the picture, not cropped. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Very weak support Only because I think it was probably not possible to get the whole dome in the frame (without merging separate images into a vertorama, anyway, which may have created a different set of problems. Daniel Case (talk) 03:41, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Certainly a QI but I don't find the composition compelling. The dome is cut on two sides, and the overlaying part at the bottom distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support The crop is a shortcoming, maybe an inevitable one, but the light is great. --Aristeas (talk) 17:59, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 00:32, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:21, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I really like this since it is a space pavilion and not yet another church. I think it would look better of you disregarded the "normal" standards of having domes like this centered and displayed in full and instead worked with lines and where they intersect corners and touch borders. I have suggested a crop that would make this a more abstract photo with cleaner lines. --Cart (talk) 11:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 27 February 2019 (UTC)