Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow 05-2012 Novodevichy 27.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Moscow 05-2012 Novodevichy 27.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2013 at 22:48:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by A.Savin 22:48, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 22:48, 5 March 2013 (UTC)- Support Nice use of perspective distortion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:44, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Comment Prefer this. JKadavoor Jee 07:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- These both pictures you can hardly compare. The vertical pano could perhaps barely pass as QI, although there are quality issues, where I tend to agree with Poco. Besides, for an FPC I prefer to nominate an unusual view (like this VERY close ultrawide-angle), as we all hopefully know that for a building photograph it's mostly not done with just good technical qualities. --A.Savin 10:06, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think it is very unusual or innovative. Any child with a mobile camera (although a bit exaggeration) can shoot like this. It is very disappointing in full resolution; the top is very unsharp, the cross disappear in the air. I'm tempted to replace this with the other picture mentioned at Novodevichy Convent. JKadavoor Jee 16:27, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- I still believe the other picture I mentioned above has more FP motive. We neglect minor technical issues here for the sake of wow (unlike in QI). JKadavoor Jee 06:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- These both pictures you can hardly compare. The vertical pano could perhaps barely pass as QI, although there are quality issues, where I tend to agree with Poco. Besides, for an FPC I prefer to nominate an unusual view (like this VERY close ultrawide-angle), as we all hopefully know that for a building photograph it's mostly not done with just good technical qualities. --A.Savin 10:06, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Arcalino (talk) 11:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Oppose. Too much distortion, look very unnatural, sorry. -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:49, 6 March 2013 (UTC)- Oppose bad crop on both sides and per George Chernilevsky. --Vamps (talk) 18:05, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose By George Chernilevsky - sorry, but 9mm wide-angle with the camera tilted upwards is too extreme. --Tuxyso (talk) 22:07, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]
Different angle of view, panorama. --A.Savin 09:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
