Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Montmorency Falls, Quebec.jpg

File:Montmorency Falls, Quebec.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2019 at 18:16:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Montmorency Falls, Quebec.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Montmorency Falls, Quebec.jpg

7487

1742

421

240

18042

6007

Strange grey rectangle like a copied-pasted section, especially visible when reducing the overall light of the image -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

7217

1652

1624

210

18042

6007

Almost overexposed -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Canada
•  Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 18:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Question Weather? Why have you chosen that category? --Cart (talk) 18:25, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Cart Thanks, the category was wrong --Wilfredor (talk) 16:13, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Superb resolution and quality. Cmao20 (talk) 20:38, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Very high resolution but dull colors in my view, maybe not the best light, the water lacks details as it is almost overexposed. Also the foreground is distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Basile Morin Please, could you show me where are the overexposition?, the water hitting generates foam and bubbles, that could explain the color white ? thanks for your review --Wilfredor (talk) 18:02, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Done, I've added two notes. When checking the details on Photoshop, by reducing the light, I discover all the shades of this fall, unfortunately completely invisible with this light which makes them all white. It means the section is not burnt but almost overexposed, with all the details missing. Also there is a weird grey part in this area, is it post-treatment ? I've added another specific note. My main objection to this picture is really the dull light and fade colors, otherwise the compo would be fine with the foreground cut -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the notes, however, I think it is the natural white color of the water, there is no overexposure, however, I respect your evaluation. A good example is this other featured image that also has white colors in the water without any detail. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 13:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too tight crop. —kallerna (talk) 05:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above--Boothsift 18:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dull colors because of flat light, WB seems a little off, and per Basile overexposed. Daniel Case (talk) 23:39, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Vulphere 07:17, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:30, 19 July 2019 (UTC)