Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mont Blanc from the Vosges.jpg

File:Mont Blanc from the Vosges.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2017 at 13:41:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mont Blanc from the Vosges.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mont Blanc from the Vosges.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created by Jörg Braukmann - uploaded by Milseburg - nominated by Milseburg -- Milseburg (talk) 13:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Milseburg (talk) 13:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment It's a long way away, but the picture is not very interesting. Charles (talk) 20:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
  • It’s a matter of what you are interested in. Such a far view isn’t ordinary. --Milseburg (talk) 15:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles. --Karelj (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles, unimpressive. Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Probably magical IRL, not so much in a photo that can only capture a small portion of the vastness that must have surrounded you in that place. Sorry.--cart-Talk 11:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Weak support It's quite difficult capture this type of views. However, 222 km isn't enough to lower my expectations. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 21:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC) You may try it for VI.
•  Oppose--shizhao (talk) 13:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

@Shizhao: You're required to give a reason why you oppose, even if just "per User" when you agree with User's remarks – Lucas^T 15:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 01:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)