Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Milkweed.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Milkweed.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2010 at 05:35:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Hoverflyz - uploaded by Hoverflyz - nominated by Patriot8790 -- патриот8790Say whatever you want 05:35, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- патриот8790Say whatever you want 05:35, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - no location, no species identification, poor depth of field with very little in focus - MPF (talk) 10:53, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- Aren't we just supposed to judge the picture, not specific details like its taxonomy? --IdLoveOne (talk) 19:31, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- No. This is not a site for uploading one's artsy pictures and get others to go all wow about them. Pictures should have an encyclopedic value. An artistically out-of-focus unidentified yellow flower has none. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- General rules #7: "Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project." Encyclopedic value is for Wikipedia to debate. Commons:Image guidelines makes it very clear that our focus is on technique and detail. --IdLoveOne (talk) 14:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- No. This is not a site for uploading one's artsy pictures and get others to go all wow about them. Pictures should have an encyclopedic value. An artistically out-of-focus unidentified yellow flower has none. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Aren't we just supposed to judge the picture, not specific details like its taxonomy? --IdLoveOne (talk) 19:31, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per MPF --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:17, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Not ID'ed. Lycaon (talk) 21:34, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose too low quality Cathy Richards (talk) 18:33, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:21, 24 September 2010 (UTC)