Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mezquita del Viernes, Shamakhi, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 22-36 HDR PAN.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2016 at 10:46:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic night view of the Juma (Friday) Mosque, Shamakhi, Azerbaijan.
Ah. I've not been impressed with LR panorama other than for trivial landscape stitches. It isn't accurate or configurable enough for architecture imo. And the HDR support is a joke. I'd be interested to see what this looked like if processed by PtGui/LR. Contact me if you would like me to try. -- Colin (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Colin, I also use mylsef PTGui Pro, when the results with Lr are not satisfactory in my eyes. Lr gets the task done though IMHO in 90% of the cases Poco2 22:00, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose Very noisy, banding and some strange artefact (see note). Put some +EV and lower temp a bit. --Mile (talk) 19:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC) p.s. Otherwise, could be central if you are hitting it.[reply]

The size is excellent, however, it's like buy a big house located in a bad zone, I preffer a small house well built in a exclusive area. The problem with supersize images is that it's easy make mistakes, in this case the problem of frindges is almost fixed, however, now I can see some like a red aura (See note). BTW, buy a expensive camera with a supersize megapixel sensor not make you automatically a good photographer and similarly to have a excellent subject like this building in front of you not make automatically a FP picture. You have continually improved your quality as a photographer and increasingly difficult to find a problem in your images. --The Photographer 12:54, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Photographer, we're here to decide if an image is among the finest on Commons. Exactly who took the picture, how experienced they are, what equipment and techniques they used, are irrelevant to that judgement (though of course they may all be factors that lead to the flaws(s) or success(es) in the final image). It isn't about trying to 'find a problem in [Poco's] images". -- Colin (talk) 15:16, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The size and image quality is important and is what I was telling him, however, more importan than the size is the tecnique used (composition, lens corrections, noise corrections, manual elements like DoF and light), a good example of what I'm telling him is the bad practice is downsize images to hide a wrong tecnique. It not was a personal comment to Poco and I admit that it seemed, however, as he is my friend I feel I can criticize him a bit more. I am usually more severe in my criticisms with Poco, Diliff and you because you are on another level and is not only photos also there are people behind the lens. --The Photographer 15:43, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 00:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Mezquita_del_Viernes,_Shamakhi,_Azerbaiyán,_2016-09-27,_DD_22-36_HDR_PAN.jpg&oldid=209479027"