Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Met rijp bedekte katjes van een els (Alnus) 02.jpg

File:Met rijp bedekte katjes van een els (Alnus) 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2017 at 06:20:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Met rijp bedekte katjes van een els (Alnus) 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Met rijp bedekte katjes van een els (Alnus) 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants # Family Betulaceae.
•  Info With hoarfrost covered catkins of alder (Alnus). All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment another great example of highly reduced, modern Dutch still lifes! :-) I'd suggest to adapt the white balance to the wintery scenery though - here it appears much too warm. An ice-cold blueish hue could further underline the intended mood, imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support thanks! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - The grayish white appearance of the photo is sufficiently frosty for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think it would be FPC sharpness even if white balance/tone sorted. -- Charlesjsharp 09:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition isn't wowing me. Agree the light looks too warm. -- Colin (talk) 13:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I don't mind the WB, but composition is somewhat lacking. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Done. WB. correction Thank you.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Colin and Julian regarding the composition. lNeverCry 20:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Alternative, another version

•  Info With hoarfrost covered catkins of alder (Alnus).--Famberhorst (talk) 05:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan above. Daniel Case (talk) 06:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Yes, I like this one, too, but I'm not sure why the people who don't support the other version would support this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

• (By the way, English word order would be "Catkins of alder (Alnus) covered with hoarfrost". English may be at base a Germanic language, but our grammar is very different from German, Dutch, and I suppose Frisian.) Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support also ok! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't find it special enough for FP. The subject is centered in the frame and it provides no wow for me. It's a beautiful sight in nature but the photograph is not impactful IMO. – Lucas^T 09:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Still per Colin and Julian. Unexciting composition. lNeverCry 17:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 20:08, 25 February 2017 (UTC)