Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mausoleo de Shah Cheragh, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 30.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2017 at 05:21:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created & uploaded by User:Poco a poco - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:21, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Support - I just consider this an outstanding photo of an awe-inspiringly beautiful place. I could easily see this as a finalist in next year's POTY. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:21, 17 April 2017 (UTC)- Support Thank you for the nom, once more, Ikan! Poco2 09:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- My pleasure! I hope other people like this photo as much as I do. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Comment It's not tilted? --Pudelek (talk) 09:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Pudelek: verticals look vertical to me on both sides. Please, consider that the picture was no taken from the front of the gate but further to the right Poco2 14:20, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Building top need perspective fix --The Photographer 16:01, 17 April 2017 (UTC)- The Photographer: what kind of perspective fix are you expecting? Please, don´t expect the top part to be horizontal, as that can only be expected if I was in front of it. If I apply perspective correction to "fix" that I will definitely deform the building Poco2 19:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support I underestand your point that this shoot not was done exactly from the center of the building. Thanks for your explain. I like this shoot. --The Photographer 19:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting object, but not really FP. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - If you can, please explain why you don't think so. I'm pretty surprised by the light interest in this photo so far, so perhaps you might be able to shed some light on that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- I move this comment from the talk page Poco2 18:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC):
- Hi Ikan Kekek, you asked me to explain my comment. I said "Interesting object, but not really FP". I think it is interesting because of the design, it has been photographed amply before. But I also feel it is not FP-quality because of the distracting objects in the photograph, like the undone poster on the left, the corrugated roof-plate, camera and loudspeaker on top and the poster on the right. Besides, the perspective seems rather artificial. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your answer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Ikan Kekek, you asked me to explain my comment. I said "Interesting object, but not really FP". I think it is interesting because of the design, it has been photographed amply before. But I also feel it is not FP-quality because of the distracting objects in the photograph, like the undone poster on the left, the corrugated roof-plate, camera and loudspeaker on top and the poster on the right. Besides, the perspective seems rather artificial. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 12:02, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
