Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Makhtesh Ramon (50785).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Makhtesh Ramon (50785).jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2017 at 01:23:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
- Info all by me — Rhododendrites talk | 01:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Makhtesh Ramon in Israel's Negev Desert, viewed from the top of Mount Gvanim. Nominating because I like the range of geological features (forms, colors), characteristic of the place. — Rhododendrites talk | 01:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral. Very beautiful, but quality is not particularly high given the moderate resolution, especially on the sides. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I could not bring a tripod and it was extremely windy up there (the "see how far you can lean forward without falling", hard to hear the person next to you sort of windy). I get what you're saying, though, and if I had a higher-end camera or took it from closer to the ground (or otherwise in less windy conditions), then the shot would likely have been better. Maybe if I go back someday. :) I'm happy with the result, though, and feel like it's still a good candidate for FP (we'll see, I suppose). — Rhododendrites talk | 05:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Very good. IMO, nothing really wrong with the quality --A.Savin 14:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Per Alexander. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support HalfGig talk 03:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Weak support Daniel Case (talk) 05:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support --fedaro (talk) 11:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Support Weak 7 --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:28, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Low quality. --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 08:54, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Because it is pleasant to look at and I keep comming back to it. --cart-Talk 10:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Support. The noise is regrettable.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is not extraordinary in such a large panorama image. -- Pofka (talk) 16:18, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose - Pretty, but doesn't quite work for me as a composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:04, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural