Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lido de Thau, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg

File:Lido de Thau, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2014 at 06:31:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lido de Thau, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lido de Thau, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg

•  Info The "Lido de Thau" an area protected by the Conservatoire du littoral along the Étang de Thau. In background a part of the town of Sète, Hérault, France. Image taken a few days after and not far from this image but in the other direction. All by me. --Christian Ferrer 06:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Great lighting and composition. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support per King of Hearts. —Blurred Lines 12:38, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --ArildV (talk) 13:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I don't see how this meets the standard at Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural. I'm not going wow and the sky looks smoggy rather than attractive. -- Colin (talk) 15:08, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but per Colin. --mathias K 16:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Per KoH. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:20, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 18:06, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Tu corriges le dust spot dans le ciel, et je supporte !--Jebulon (talk) 21:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

   Done Thanks, I had seen it before before to go to job but after having returned I forgot... --Christian Ferrer 06:55, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose Bad lighting and per Colin. -Kikos (talk) 07:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support, Per King of Hearts. --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 14:12, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm not convinced by the usage of a telephoto here, the resulting compression of perspective gives a feeling of being trapped in a box, which is not of my taste for landscape photography. Sorry --PierreSelim (talk) 06:21, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:30, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Difficult, quality and lighting are good, composition ok but there is something missing here that makes it remarkable. I also agree with Pierrre's comment Poco² 15:19, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support as promised.--Jebulon (talk) 16:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:44, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /—Colin (talk) 13:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Missing gallery! (see the documentation).