Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lörrach - Burg Rötteln - Oberburg1.jpg

File:Lörrach - Burg Rötteln - Oberburg1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2012 at 20:56:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lörrach - Burg Rötteln - Oberburg1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lörrach - Burg Rötteln - Oberburg1.jpg

•  Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 20:56, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 20:56, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Very attractive image. Saturation is just a bit high but OK IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:04, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
• Oppose Seriously wonky verticals. If meant to be an artistic perspective rather than accurate, then the composition just doesn't quite work IMO. The structure on the RHS is distracting. Colin (talk) 13:44, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Verticals are so wonky as they had to be in a wide angle picture, such as in your own picture File:King's Cross Western Concourse.jpg --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:35, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

You know, I never understand the Commons FP style of nominating an unusual picture and not explaining it. What you, as a photographer, were trying to achieve. Explain why it is the way it is, etc. Would save a lot of head scratching sometimes. Ok, the wide-angle effect isn't quite working for me here. But I'm going  Neutral. Colin (talk) 07:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

I understand your opinion and I can try to straighten the verticals. But not in every case this looks good or better than a wide angle. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:05, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Agree. Straightening might not achieve a great result here. I think it is just a matter of taste now. Colin (talk) 09:49, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Ausgezeichnet. Herzlichen Glückwunsch. – Ich kann generell nichts damit anfangen, dass hier alle Vertikalen stets geradegezogen werden müssen ;-) Letztendlich ist dies deine Interpretation des Themas und in diesem Fall unterstreicht die Perspektive auch den Eindruck, dass die Burg hoch in den Himmel hinaufragt. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:28, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose nice castle, good image, but not FP for me. Disturbing building in the bottom right corner, not the best lighting (shady on the left, bright areas on the castle) and the image is sky-heavy (himmellastig, too much sky IMHO). The distortions are okay, even if they are disturbing though. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:32, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support wie Frank Schulenburg. --Ralf Roleček 20:17, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Disturbing perspective distortion plus building on the right corner. --Ivar (talk) 05:56, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Atmospheric, with interesting foreground. --Gavin Collins (talk) 15:16, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info without disturbing foreground and more Castle --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:11, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think this crop is too tight on the bottom. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 12:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment I also think the crop is (too) tight at bottom, the sky is a bit noisy; die obere Bildaufteilung mit der nicht zentrierten Burg gefiel mir auch besser. Allerdings, diese Aufnahme ist wesentlich besser (IMHO) und die Burg wird besser in Szene gesetzt, daher unentschieden... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:01, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:56, 1 October 2012 (UTC)