Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kyoto Station November 2016 -03.jpg

File:Kyoto Station November 2016 -03.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2017 at 07:37:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kyoto Station November 2016 -03.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kyoto Station November 2016 -03.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Japan
•  Info Unlike my existing FP of Kyoto Station (which serves as "panoramic photo of the cavernous space," to quote Ikan), this nomination hopes to primarily illustrate the enormous vertical dimension - 70m! - of this great transportation hub. The exposure was 5 seconds, so moving people are blurred. I like this effect as it also underlines the hustle and bustle you find yourself confronted with when visiting this great example of Hiroshi Hara's somewhat futurist architecture. All by me, --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  OpposeWhat is the speciality of this image. I can't find anything except the upper part looks complex...--Shriheeran (talk) 14:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Good photo of an extraondinary place. I half expect to see Luke and Vader crossing sabers on the bridge between the platforms over the restaurant area. --cart-Talk 14:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support -- Thennicke (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I like many of your interior / U-Bahn photos, but some have possible FoP problems. In this case, all is fine. Some unsharpness at edges, though. --A.Savin 04:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Remarkable --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I was prepared to oppose until I looked at it closeup and saw how big the space is. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Wowing composition --Milseburg (talk) 11:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose--shizhao (talk) 13:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)#

@Shizhao: You're required to give a reason why you oppose – Lucas^T 15:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

And this guy [1] is a administrator here people! --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Composition messy--shizhao (talk) 12:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Neutral Quality is good and subject/perspective are interesting, but the bottom part is too loaded, I would have opted for a completely different crop, keeping approx. only the half top part Poco² 19:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Japan