Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum East Court.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum East Court.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2016 at 22:21:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Info created by Mdbeckwith - uploaded by Mdbeckwith - nominated by Mdbeckwith (talk) 22:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Mdbeckwith (talk) 22:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Moderate Support - Someone might complain about the perspectival distortion toward the left and right, but I'm OK with that because it's easy to understand and doesn't look strange to me. However, the picture has some noise at full size. It looks good enough at full-page size for me to accept it, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
OpposeThe corners are completely blurry and a perspective correction is needed. Lack of symmetry, too. --Code (talk) 06:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support The corners are still blurry but I can live with that now that the perspective is corrected. The noise doesn't really bother me. --Code (talk) 13:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral
as Code. --Hubertl 09:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)changed to neutral, the right upper corner is still not straight --Hubertl 20:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC) - Oppose Perspective correction needed, per Code. Daniel Case (talk) 16:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- It's better now, but there's still very visible ringing around the ceiling arches. Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Info I've added perspective correction Mdbeckwith (talk) 22:30 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - Make sure to ping everyone who's already voted on this picture. It looks a heck of a lot better, although there is still noise in the upper near corners, as noted by Code, and also in the higher elevations of the picture in general. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 31 January 2016 (UTC)