Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Keble College Chapel Interior 2, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg

File:Keble College Chapel Interior 2, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2015 at 13:47:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Keble College Chapel Interior 2, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Keble College Chapel Interior 2, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg

27

6489

7692

214

8012

7157

Line curves up a bit to the left.

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by mirrys 13:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mirrys (talk) 13:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:37, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Just my opinion, this is an alternative of that nomination, or not? --Laitche (talk) 15:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • I must admit, it is very similar but it's not of exactly the same thing. This is of the choir and sanctuary, the other one is of the nave which also shows the choir and sanctuary in the background. The focus is on different parts of the chapel but the views do overlap a bit. Diliff (talk) 17:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
• I tend to think the geometric distortions at the top of the pillars at the sides are simply too large to not distract the viewer. I do not find this nomination as good as the pther FP from the same college. Moreover, there is something which appear unbalanced to me in the foreground to the left, see annotation. It may be it is such in the college - often things are not quite symmetrical, it just distrcats my eye a bit. Otherwise very good. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • My interior panoramas are quite methodical so I would be surprised if there was a major problem with the symmetry of the panorama, if it's something very asymmetrical in the scene, it's probably because the reality is like that. Yes, the horizontal line near the bottom does seem to tilt a little bit. It's usually the result of not quite centring the panorama perfectly. When the centre point is set slightly to the left or right of the centre (really just a couple of pixels off-centre), it has the effect of shifting the perspective slightly, and horizontal lines will lean a tiny bit. That's what's happened here I think. It wouldn't be so significant that it would completely upset the balance of the scene though and I don't think the slight lean of it is really noticeable unless you line it up against the bottom of the screen or something, but I'm happy to correct it as it's a fairly simple fix. Diliff (talk) 22:08, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
    • If it is a simple fix, please correct it, thanks. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:54, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support what light! -- Christian Ferrer 12:03, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:05, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Same place and same composition as other nomination, but different point of view and main subject, so different picture. --Kadellar (talk) 12:24, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment If this nomination (as other nomination), both we can promoted? If so, it's OK for me. --Laitche (talk) 13:05, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:08, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:28, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 20:06, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 08:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings