Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Juliette 2001-09-26 1800Z.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Juliette 2001-09-26 1800Z.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2023 at 18:48:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images#North America
Info created by NASA - uploaded by FleurDeOdile - nominated by TheBigBookOfNaturalScience -- TheBigBookOfNaturalScience (talk) 18:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Support -- High-quality image of a nearly circular hurricane with a very rare and more unique triple eyewall. TheBigBookOfNaturalScience (talk) 18:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -- Can't nominate an article that people think are a joke. Like really, I came back overnight to find this image with no votes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBigBookOfNaturalScience (talk • contribs) 08:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment Hello TheBigBookOfNaturalScience, I am sorry that the absence of votes on your nomination has upset you. Satellite weather images are not the most common kind of subject on this FPC (Featured Picture Candidates) page; in such cases people often hesitate to vote. Please do not take this personal – people certainly did not want to treat you in an unfair manner, they just were not sure about the photo. Taking myself as an example, I just did not yet find the time to have a closer look at this candidate, sorry. One long-time FPC regular once told me, “FPC is often like a journey with the roller coaster, sometimes like a journey with the ghost train; you newer know for sure if and how people will vote.” Of course that is a bit exagerrated ;–), but it’s always important not to take FPC too serious; patience and leniency are always necessary. Visit this page from time to time, watch how the voting works, and try it again, I am sure that you will have success when nominating good images – not always, but often. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 15:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- PS: Finally having looked at the photo carefully, I can say that I would have voted for it. Sorry that I did not find time for that earlier. Please do not withdraw so early the next time. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 15:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Dear TheBigBookOfNaturalScience, also from my side I'm sorry that I accidentally made a review in the already withdrawn nomination because I slipped in the line to give my support to the nomination above yours. I agree with Aristeas that weather pictures are usually not reviewed immediately, you often have to give them the full nomination period. After I had now the time to look at the picture carefully, I would have also given my support. Maybe you release the nomination again to just keep trying, there are still 5½ days until nomination closes. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I won't be able to release it again due to the nomination limit and the time limit. Even by then, I probably won't get enough votes for it to be nominated. I will have to create another nomination instead. TheBigBookOfNaturalScience (talk) 17:36, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
