Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Imago of Colorado potato beetle on leaf with eggs.jpg

File:Imago of Colorado potato beetle on leaf with eggs.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2020 at 07:14:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Imago of Colorado potato beetle on leaf with eggs.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Imago of Colorado potato beetle on leaf with eggs.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Order_:_Coleoptera_(Beetles)
•  Info created by Adámoz - uploaded by Adámoz - nominated by Adámoz -- Adámoz (talk) 07:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Adámoz (talk) 07:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Question - Can you give geographic coordinates, or at least an approximate location? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Done --Adámoz (talk) 08:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but I don't think this macro shot is well done. I also find the composition and the leaves too distracting. Not an FP for me. --T.Bednarz (talk) 08:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support - The beetle is only 10 mm long. The DoF of the eggs could be better, but the beetle is pretty sharp for such a small creature. I agree that the composition could be better, so only weak support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose the eggs must be in focus. Charles (talk) 09:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Question I must zoom in? --Adámoz (talk) 10:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

• Not sure what you mean. F4 aperture never going to work. Charles (talk) 13:55, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not bad, but the eggs should have been in focus. The stem in the right is distracting for me. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 13:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Done --Adámoz (talk) 13:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above, a fairly good shot considering small size of beetle but the depth of field is not good enough. Cmao20 (talk) 16:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Since you uploaded a new version of the file, the whole resolution of the image is under 1 MB, so it's not even a QI. --T.Bednarz (talk) 17:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

• I think this is a confusion of file size and resolution. The file size is under 1MB but I can't see anything in the QI criteria rules about that. The resolution of the version to which you link is 5.3 mpx. Cmao20 (talk) 20:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

• Exactly, my bad. --T.Bednarz (talk) 20:34, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Somehow, I like it - Benh (talk) 18:34, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Per Benh; also: high educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Benh and Frank. --Aristeas (talk) 08:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Draceane. --Grtek (talk) 13:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

 Done The egggs are in focus. --Adámoz (talk) 10:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

No, not done. You've added some sharpening, but out of focus is out of focus - it's just not possible to fix that through (conventional) post processing. If anything, you made it worse by introducing additional noise in the background. --El Grafo (talk) 10:34, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Eggs still out of focus, just now with noise. Charles (talk) 11:20, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Indeed. If you keep this version, I will change my vote to opposing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

I reverted this. --Adámoz (talk) 14:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Foxxiestst (talk) 11:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC) Not eligible to vote --A.Savin 13:31, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:31, 9 April 2020 (UTC)