Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Image taken with a broken camera.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2011 at 19:18:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An image taken with a broken camera
  •  Info everything by mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 19:18, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info Here's the story. I went to tide pools with my 2 mega pixels underwater Sony. I was looking down at the pool, when a rock I was standing on got way. I fell in a pool face down, and hurt myself. Apparently my underwater shock resistant Sony got "hurt" too because here you see an example of the images it started to take ever since Does this image has EV? I guess it does because it is more or less typical image taken with a broken camera. please see example here. Besides it is something different, and with New Year coming why not to have something different? And besides one could not oppose the image because of quality issues. After all it was taken with a broken camera --Mbz1 (talk) 19:18, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 19:18, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Nice joke for me, but no. Beside it is not bad enough to come from a Korean horror film. ;o) Yann (talk) 06:09, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, come on mow, Yann. I have never said that it was bad enough to come from a Korean horror film. I only said that it was good enough to become FP on commons --Mbz1 (talk) 01:06, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose ev is questionable. please consider reworking the image description. describing the difference to a "normal" shot can help others in understanding the meaning of this image. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 18:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I will appreciate, if you will re-write the description please.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:32, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 22:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]