Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Benito, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 15.jpg

File:Iglesia de San Benito, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 15.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2016 at 21:39:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Benito, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 15.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Benito, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 15.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info Gothic-style interior of the church of San Benito, historic center of Cambados, province of Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain. The church, of neoclassical style, was formerly a Romanesque temple, renewed in the 15th century and rebuilt in the 17th century by order or Gonzalo de Valladares, whose remains are inside the temple. All by me, Poco² 21:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 21:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - I'd be inclined to support this, but first, please explain the slant of the walls in your picture, as opposed to this one and this one. Does the wall slant or not? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

  Ikan: as in this case versus this other case. I find it more interesting like this than after a perspective correction Poco² 23:02, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks. I find that a sensible argument and will  Support featuring this on that basis. But I think there should be some kind of explanation that the wall is not actually slanted but is shown this way in order to be able to show more of the vaulted ceiling, along with the wall, or however you'd like to explain it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Per Ikan. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support since the uncorrected perspective is Poco's stated intent. Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 06:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I've read. But sorry no for me, and the crop above does not help.--Jebulon (talk) 13:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sometimes pointing up can work. Not this time I think. Too much distorted. (perhaps too much sharpening leading to noise). I think this scene asks for a 360 panorama. -- Colin (talk) 20:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 00:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)