Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:House in Cappadocia.jpg

File:House in Cappadocia.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 5 May 2009 at 02:19:41

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 02:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 02:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support interesting, good quality --ianaré (talk) 03:46, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support As above --Muhammad (talk) 07:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not as outstanding as your previous photo of the same subject Tiago Fioreze (talk) 17:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

I do not think it is a good enough reason to oppose the image. This image is a good addition to the one you pointed out because it shows a close up of the house and even some furniture.I'm not sure which one of the two is more outstanding, but IMO each of them is more outstanding than many other cureent FP and FPC on this very page.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

 Comment Your previous photo nicely shows context (+ excellent composition). I can't tell the same about this one. What I meant to say with "not as outstanding as" was that the composition of this photo does not pay off. Tiago Fioreze (talk) 18:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, it is an absolutely different image of absolutely different subject. I am really not sure how two of them could be compared, but ... Thanks for you vote and for your comment.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:28, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Tiago. Can't see an addition --Richard Bartz (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support—Notyourbroom (talk) 17:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I think this is a sort of messy, colourless shot with a seemingly arbitrary crop. Lots of things cut off and unfortunately eye-catching trees in the bottom right. Maedin\^talk 20:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose as Maedin --Lycaon (talk) 22:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose, I agree with Maedin. It's also quite oversharpened. --Aqwis (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose looks strangely overprocessed. The crop seems arbitrary. And it is not absolutely different, in fact it is most likely taken from the same vantage point as File:Cappadocia_March_2006.jpg (the structures from this candidate are visible in the lower right). --Dschwen (talk) 20:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Daniel, although I cannot agree with your assessment of my image, I'd like to thank you for voting on it. I missed your reviews on my nominations for quite some time. I am really glad we're back to normal :), and that you are back on reviewing FPC. I mean it. Thank you!--Mbz1 (talk) 19:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. So what did you do with the image that makes it look somewhat like an old photochrome postcard? --Dschwen (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I honestly cannot remember. Maybe sharpened it a litlle bit too much. If you'd like me to I could upload an original image (I hope I still have one) and let you to figure out what I've done to it. --Mbz1 (talk) 20:15, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per others. —kallerna™ 16:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

result: 5 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC)