Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Highfallsrochester.jpg

File:Highfallsrochester.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 10 May 2009 at 18:14:38

•  Info created by Evilarry - uploaded by Evilarry - nominated by Evilarry -- Evilarry (talk) 18:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Evilarry (talk) 18:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting photo! Tiago Fioreze (talk) 20:50, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Question looks tilted and distorted, can you fix ? --ianaré (talk) 23:46, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Worth watching. Besides perspective mentioned by Ianare the quality (focus, composition) isn't that good --Richard Bartz (talk).
•  Comment what are you talking about? the focus is flawless and the IQ is excellent, why would you say its not focused when it blatantly is ? --evilarry (talk) 23:46, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
  • It looks blurry, maybe you used an imge stabilizer while doing long time exposure ? --Richard Bartz (talk) 10:10, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
  • No, it was on a tripod with a remote timer. I do not have IS on my lenses. --evilarry (talk)
    • Denoising ? --Richard Bartz (talk) 15:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
      • No, the image is sharp - you just dont seem to be able to tell... Look at any of the defined lines around the waterfall, look at the bricks in the waterfall cliff side... all very sharp and detailed. You're just being negative for the sake of negativity. --evilarry
        • Whatever. I don't like it for fp. --Richard Bartz (talk) 15:49, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment please add the camera location ([1]). Otourly (talk) 17:58, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment You can use the {{Geo}} template to make that request, too. :) —Notyourbroom (talk) 19:47, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. --Karel (talk) 09:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but the composition doesn't convince me. —kallerna™ 11:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 15:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition, blur. This is obviously a nice picture. But not FP level in my opinion. Sorry... Everybody will hate me tonight... --Berru (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Quality defaults on one side, very eye catching scenery on the other (waterfall, urban decay)... The choice was hard, but I support --S23678 (talk) 05:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 08:47, 11 May 2009 (UTC)