Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hemiolaus cobaltina underside aberration.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2019 at 21:22:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info An unrecorded aberration which I had rather hoped might be a species new to science.The wing span is around 25mm, so the 'height' is about 13mm. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Charles (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2019 (UTC)- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral Shadow problem on the butterfly border (see note) --Photographer 02:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
I can see no 'shadow problem'. No layers have been used. Please explain what you are seeing.Charles (talk) 08:53, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support I couldn't find the "shadow problem" mentioned above. I like the colours, the DoF, and also the butterfly's shadow underneath it. It helps to understand the shape of the wings. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:16, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- I now see the original "unrecorded aberration" was in fact a weird Photoshopping mistake. While I'm sure Charles didn't do it to "invent" a new species, I'm not comfortable with this degree of carelessness.
Abstain . -- Colin (talk) 13:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- I now see the original "unrecorded aberration" was in fact a weird Photoshopping mistake. While I'm sure Charles didn't do it to "invent" a new species, I'm not comfortable with this degree of carelessness.
Comment You're absolutely right Ryan Hodnett that something very weird has happened during editing. It's not stitching as this was just one image so it must be human error. Apologies. Will reprocess. Charles (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- New version uploaded Photographer Ryan Hodnett. Charles (talk) 16:13, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Is there still an aberration? Where? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- No, but I don't think I can change file name till voting process over. Charles (talk) 23:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- You could see the shadow problem what Im talking about here File:Bad union between layers that generates shadow.jpg. User:Podzemnik --Photographer 02:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- I can just about see a difference. No layers were used, but a shadow can come from colour noise reduction - that's the only possibility I can think of. See what you think of the new version Photographer Charles (talk) 11:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Do you see any problems with new version? Photographer Charles (talk) 21:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I still see the same problem in lesser proportion. My suggestion is not to repair an image to which a noise reduction has been applied wrongly, but to rethink the way you use to eliminate noise and start the process again but in the right way. --Photographer 15:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Ryan Hodnett (talk) 05:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- I can just about see a difference. No layers were used, but a shadow can come from colour noise reduction - that's the only possibility I can think of. See what you think of the new version Photographer Charles (talk) 11:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:30, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:11, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:50, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
