Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Heath fritillary (Melitaea athalia lachares).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Heath fritillary (Melitaea athalia lachares).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2017 at 22:07:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
- Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 22:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Charles (talk) 22:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 04:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurred a bit and not so sharp. Just average quality, no WOW for me, sorry. -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- another revenge vote from George. Charles (talk) 09:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Please, don't take offense. There is no "revenge" anyway. You can see my support votes of Your nominations here and here and here and more. Very friendly, -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- My apologies, George. I'm too touchy today! Charles (talk) 21:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- All OK now, have a good day! -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- My apologies, George. I'm too touchy today! Charles (talk) 21:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Please, don't take offense. There is no "revenge" anyway. You can see my support votes of Your nominations here and here and here and more. Very friendly, -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Lack of sharpness. Sorry. ~ Moheen (keep talking) 09:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support What's sharp is what needs to be sharp. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support per Daniel --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Moheen El Golli Mohamed (talk) 09:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- Question @El Golli Mohamed: I hope this isn't a revenge vote because of Charles rejection of your picture, is it? Namely the sharpness here is much better! --Hockei (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral I'm not quite convinced of the composition. --Hockei (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness should be better for FP. Plus the lighting looks a bit unnatural. -- Pofka (talk) 20:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results: