Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haslach townhall.JPG

File:Haslach townhall.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2015 at 16:07:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Haslach townhall.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haslach townhall.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 16:07, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 16:07, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support ----Isasza (talk) 18:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:01, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 10 km to known Biberach...wish could be sharper, got feeling you applied NR on the sky, and bottom underwent it too. But i like composition, colors, well chosen time. Clouds deliver something more. --Mile (talk) 17:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment No noise reduction, neither in the sky nor in the bottom (but a professional sensor cleaning some days before, which also reduces some noise). Concernig the weather: A short time after the photo was taken, the sky was completely grey and it began to rain. --Llez (talk) 19:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very well-done technically, a QI for certain but ... there's a reason that most truly interesting pictures of buildings prefer the three-quarter angle over a straight-on front view, and that's why I can't support this as an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment The flowers at the right corner belong to a larger fountain. Moving to the right to get a tree-quarter angle would have caused, that a part of the intersting facade would have been obscured. So I chose the frontal view. --Llez (talk) 21:10, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

I understand, but that's a tradeoff we make. Daniel Case (talk) 21:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose Overall a bit unsharp to be an FP and the composition is not outstanding, maybe needs good tripod and a head like this shot, imo. --Laitche (talk) 21:44, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Basically per Daniel, sorry. --El Grafo (talk) 11:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 10:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with opposers.--Jebulon (talk) 12:23, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Merops (talk) 04:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture