Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Groep bomen in verruigd biotoop. Locatie, Oostvaardersplassen 01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2016 at 06:26:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
- Info Simple beauty. Group of trees in overgrown habitat. Location, Oostvaardersplassen in the Netherlands. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I love your sensibility, and you're not wrong that this is a good photo, but I don't find the composition interesting enough to vote to feature it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support perfect rule of thirds. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 16:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 18:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 19:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC) as Alchemist-hp
- Support -- Jiel (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose This is my favorite kind of composition, but the foreground is just mush. Maybe that's the point, I don't know, but it doesn't work for me. -- Ram-Man 23:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. Lacks foreground detail and needs a more interesting subject. And "rule of thirds" isn't a mark of quality in itself -- merely an easy-to-explain compositional suggestion for beginners. -- Colin (talk) 12:09, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Colin; I'd be a lot happier with this composition if the image had been taken from half a meter lower, obscuring the distracting foliage in the background with grass -- Thennicke (talk) 16:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice, but for me not on par with the bar for FPs of minimalist compositions of a solitary tree in a field. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support I like it. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor foreground detail, per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice but not outstanding as a photograph, per others. Too much NR applied to foreground, and there’s a distracting unsharp foreground object is cutting the horizon on the left. @ArionEstar: Once more, this is not facebook. The question is not whether you like it or not, the question is whether you think this is so outstantingly excellent that it deserves to be counted among the very finest photographs there are on Commons. --Kreuzschnabel 06:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)