Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Green bee-eater in Patiala, India.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Green bee-eater in Patiala, India.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2022 at 15:28:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)
- Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose This is, I'm afraid, only just QI and if cropped a sensible amount would be too small and too soft. A bird on a wire is also never ideal. It is also sensible to check whether a portrait-style image like this could be good enough to be considered for the infobox in a Wikipedia article. This isn't. Please check the current nomination for a bee-eater to see how you must enter the appropriate FP category. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Relatively small resolution, low level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment It's sharp, with good bokeh, and I don't mind the barbed wire. I also appreciate a roomy crop when it makes sense (although typically you want a little more space in the direction it's facing than space behind it), but as others say, it's just rather small compared with FPs of birds these days. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing wrong with it but too small for FP in 2022, the detail on the bird is too little especially seeing it only takes up a small part of the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 21:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per others, especially Cmao20 and Basile (I think it's OK that the bird is on a wire). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Very weak oppose A good image technically as it is, but per others I think it could be cropped in a bit, and that would make it too small. Daniel Case (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 23:34, 9 April 2022 (UTC)