Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand canyon of Yellowstone and Yellowstone fall.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Grand canyon of Yellowstone and Yellowstone fall.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2009 at 20:36:06
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 20:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 20:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Info 2nd voting (1st voting) —kallerna™ 22:01, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- No, this image was never voted before. I uploaded a new version few days ago--Mbz1 (talk) 22:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support —kallerna™ 22:01, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Lack of depth of field. →Diti the penguin — 22:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- My Metadata was lost in one of my PS edits, but here's the original File:Yellowstone canyon not post processed image.jpg. I do not think that with F11 we could talk about "Lack of depth of field". Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well, you may be right… though I would have preferred if DoP was a bit more pronounced, using a f/6.3 aperture for example. Apart from this, which is a personal taste, I think the photo is really good. →Diti the penguin — 08:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose The colors look too saturated and the contrast seem a bit high. /Daniel78 (talk) 23:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Great shot of the waterfall, and you can see the flow of water, when zoomed in to look at details. But there are a couple of places which look like saturated white, and something about the canyon sides wipes out the DOF. Perhaps a couple of hours earlier or later in the day would put shadows in the right places. Otherwise, I like it and may support when I've had a night's sleep. -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 00:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 11:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Edit 1, not featured
[edit]- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 00:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Looks great at a larger preview. Crapload (talk) 21:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 11:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Original (not post processed)
[edit]- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 00:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- It is a good image IMO. Please feel free to play with colors, everybody. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support I don't know why, but I like that one. →Diti the penguin — 20:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Crapload (talk) 21:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 11:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)