Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Canyon of Yellowstonen.jpg

File:Grand Canyon of Yellowstonen.jpg, withdrawn

Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2009 at 14:35:36

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 14:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 14:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose -It's underexposed, overall quality is ... oh well --Richard Bartz (talk) 14:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, Richard. I guess at this point the only thing that is left to me is to thank you for not spelling out "oh well" :)--Mbz1 (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Support I really do like it. I can do better edit of this file if you want. —kallerna™ 13:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Sure, go ahead. Don't you think that ALT1 down below has a better light for you to work with? Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:25, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

This is my edit of this file. I'll make another from ALT1. —kallerna™ 07:16, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose agree with Richard --AngMoKio (talk) 23:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Thank you, Kallerna--Mbz1 (talk) 15:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 19:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Edit 1 of original by Kallerna, not featured

•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 15:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support —kallerna™ 14:46, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Alt 1, withdrawn

•  Support Any better?--Mbz1 (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Not really --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, Richard. I uploaded a new edit over the one you reviewed.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose --AngMoKio (talk) 23:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Info I made edit of this file. —kallerna™ 07:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

 Thank you, Kallerna--Mbz1 (talk) 15:00, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 19:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Edit 1 from Alt 1 by Kallerna, not featured

•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 15:00, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support —kallerna™ 14:46, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Edit 1 of Original, not featured

•  Info Shadows lifted to show details.
•  Support --Muhammad (talk) 21:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Thank you, Muhammad!--Mbz1 (talk) 22:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose, extremely artificial-looking. --Aqwis (talk) 22:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose just a little more sun and it would have been perfect. sorry --ianaré (talk) 00:15, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry for opposing all 3 but you really have to take care with post-processing. It seems to me that you always make the same things to give the sky more drama (or the pic in general). This doesn't improve your pics imho. Maybe it is just your monitor that doesn't show you the "truth". --AngMoKio (talk) 23:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support It looks good on my monitor. --Ltshears (talk) 19:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Zakharii 13:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose It looks like this is the best edit so far, but I still have problems with it. There is significant chromatic aberration in the distant trees, and almost no focus. I'm having trouble finding a single element in the photograph that is actually sharp. Sorry, because otherwise, it's stunning. Maedin\^talk 19:17, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 19:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)