Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gm-kolokolna-4138.jpg

File:Gm-kolokolna-4138.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Feb 2011 at 18:03:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Gm-kolokolna-4138.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gm-kolokolna-4138.jpg

•  Info created by PereslavlFoto - uploaded by PereslavlFoto - nominated by PereslavlFoto -- PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment -- The sky looks unnaturally blue to me... Jon C (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment -- Long exposition used (7 minutes). Also, there is a town with its lights.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:00, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I´ll have to agree with Jon C, but then again, I have never been to Russia. If I am not mistaken though, this is the same color as in the blue-screen of Windows (intended as a joke).--Snaevar (talk) 00:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  •  Question What time of day was this taken? Is the sun visible there this time of year? I ask because the foreground seems to be very bright. Brighter than I would think those lights could do and the lighting seems hard to figure. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 15:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
    •  Question Dark night, lamps prepared for Cristmas happening, long exposition used. To the left there's a well-lit avenue. The tree in the corned stays near the lamp-line.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:00, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good picture of the blue hour, but the f/11 number creates sun glare (or light glare, in this case) in photos and the long exposure only makes the light even more intense. The result is a few burnt pixels and the overexposure that IdLoveOne mentioned erlier.--Snaevar (talk) 18:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • What do you mean by «light glare»? (English is not perfect to catch the idea.) Long exposure intended to have a bright & vivid picture. F/11 intended to have "star effect" and fine DOF.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Since the lighting is intentional and meant to serve an artistic purpose, though I think you overdid it. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 17:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Jujutacular ^talk 20:07, 21 February 2011 (UTC)