Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Girl Septermber 2008-1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Girl Septermber 2008-1.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2010 at 14:52:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Portrait of a girl, in tones of blue and green Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Neutral. This is more of a QI to me. It is a well done solid shot, and certainly a pleasant end result. But it does not surprise me, it doesn't have an original idea behind it. --Dschwen (talk) 16:12, 11 March 2010 (UTC)- Support We need more FP of people. I don't see any technical reasons why it would not be a FP. Yann (talk) 16:35, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Per Yann - there's more to the world of photography than insects and birds. --MichaelBueker (talk) 17:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Per Everyone... but that doesn't mean we should feature any portrait. That one doesn't stand out from others (Don't see any attack against the model anyone..;) )... and background is quite distracting to my taste for a portrait. Sorry Joaquim. - Benh (talk) 20:43, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Comment - Very seldom I come in defense of my pictures ... and dames. In this case, I truly believe this photo is special due to the quality of the indirect lighting, the composition, the combination of colors and (of course) the beauty of the subject. Am I being partial? I don't think so. The fact that this is just the portrait of a common European girl dressed in a common way (the exotic touch is absent) shoudn't in my opinion affect the outcome. (Well, I think I'm talking too much, maybe because of the long absence) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)- Support Excellent technical qualities. Subject is great in its simplicity. Background is not distracting IMHO. Nice job! And welcome back again, Joaquim. -- MJJR (talk) 22:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Per MichaelBueker... --Cephas (talk) 23:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral I like the detail and light, centered composition (in landscape format) and background don't quite do it for me. --Dori - Talk 02:56, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Well made portrait, nothing wrong technically that I can see, and I like the light. But I'm sorry, the composition and pose don't make it stand out for me. -- Avenue (talk) 06:12, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Benh. —kallerna™ 11:03, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:47, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks normal, but an ordinary photograph. Snowmanradio (talk) 16:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I think that the associated documentation is inadequate. I think that some more details should be given; perhaps the girls age, ethnic origin, and where in the world the photograph could be added. Snowmanradio (talk) 16:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral It looks like any random picture from a family photobook. Not bad looking, but too common. —§ stay (sic)! 11:32, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 12:08, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 3 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
