Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:George Romney - Lady Hamilton (as Nature).jpg

File:George Romney - Lady Hamilton (as Nature).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2016 at 18:29:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:George Romney - Lady Hamilton (as Nature).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:George Romney - Lady Hamilton (as Nature).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
•  Info created by George Romney - uploaded by Sir Gawain - nominated by NMaia -- ~★ nmaia ^{[[mia diskuto]]} 18:29, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- ~★ nmaia ^{[[mia diskuto]]} 18:29, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Quality digitization, down to the craquelure. Daniel Case (talk) 21:06, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support per Daniel. This painting could use a very careful restoration, so in addition to his points, this might serve as a useful "before" photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Daniel Case, Ikan Kekek, I'"m not sure I understand well. Do you wish somebody try to correct the craquelures ?--Jebulon (talk) 16:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

• Only if they do it without damaging the painting in any way. Given how destructive "restorations" often are, it would be much better for them to do nothing than to be aggressive. But why are you confused? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

For my part, I like the craquelure. It's what I'd expect to see when viewing the actual painting. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

I agree. But I'm interested in trying to remove them just for the challenge. I'll be back here in one or two years...--Jebulon (talk) 09:22, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

(And I should surely find very funny how you, english-speaking native speakers, you pronounce the french word "Craquelure")--Jebulon (talk) 09:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

J'ai un accent en francais, mais peut-etre c'est pas horrible quand je suis en practique. En tout cas, je n'ai pas racommende' que vous envoliez le craquelure digitelement (?) dans le photographe, mais que peut-etre on peut l'envoler dans la peinture elle-meme. :-) (Escusez touts les erreurs en gendre; je veux pas utiliser Google Translate pour les corrigir maintenant.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Excellent  ! Je t'aime, Ikan Kekek !👍🏻--Jebulon (talk) 11:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Hihihi. Tu me fais rougir... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:55, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Yep! --cart-Talk 00:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 08:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Jee 13:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 08:38, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 10:47, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 21:27, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media