Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Formicidae sp (2).jpg

File:Formicidae sp (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2010 at 12:01:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Formicidae sp (2).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Formicidae sp (2).jpg

•  Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 12:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 12:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Distracting composition. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:20, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The background is distracting from the actual subject, and I know it's hard to get a perfect shot, but the bluriness in the upper-right is a bit too prominent. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 20:25, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose no species identification - MPF (talk) 23:30, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Since when is species id a requirement? --Muhammad (talk) 04:47, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
    • It isn't a requirement (if it was, the pic would be tagged {FPX} as ineligible for voting), but it is a major part of the value of an image, and absence is a good reason for an oppose vote. An image of an organism without specific identity is unlikely to find any usage on the various wikipedias, and therefore against the value ethos of featured picture status. - MPF (talk) 09:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
      • Agreed. If the identity till species is not possible however, then reservations should be made. --Muhammad (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose background --Leafnode✉ 09:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Background distracts the subject. --Techman224^Talk 21:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:18, 13 May 2010 (UTC)