Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fly Agaric (Amanita muscaria) 3.JPG

File:Fly Agaric (Amanita muscaria) 3.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2013 at 21:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Fly Agaric (Amanita muscaria) 3.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fly Agaric (Amanita muscaria) 3.JPG

•  Info all by -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:42, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:42, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support. Nice composition. —Bruce1ee^talk 05:10, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose now because of File:Amanita muscaria Marriott Falls 1.jpg. Will change my vote if this is a different var. and is specified. JKadavoor Jee 07:28, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
  •  Done Although since when can we only have one featured picture of a species? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:23, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
    •  Support Thanks. We don't have such a rule; only my view point. I can't see any reason to feature a picture if already a better picture available, eventhough it is nominated by anybody so far. BTW, the picture I mentioned above is not a COM:FP so far. JKadavoor Jee 05:59, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
      • I agree to an extent; we don't need hundreds of FPs of cats and dogs and other commonly photographed species. But I think if the images are sufficiently different then it's fine to have more than one FP of a species (or any subject for that matter). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 06:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
        • I too not that much strict. I support different views (like dorsal, ventral), sexes, forms (dry, wet, breeding) etc. Again, this is (my POV) just a matter of my taste (to reduce the redundancy in FPs). :) JKadavoor Jee 09:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 10:28, 16 March 2013 (UTC)